Cost Comparison of Popular Garment Printing Methods

Created on 12.08

In the dynamic world of textile and merchandise decoration, choosing the right printing method is a crucial business decision that hinges on quality, application, and critically—cost. Cost isn't just about ink or film; it's a complex equation of equipment investment, labor, material waste, and scalability.

Here’s a practical breakdown of the cost structures for popular printing methods.

1. Direct-to-Garment (DTG) Printing

Principle: An inkjet printer deposits water-based inks directly onto the garment.
Cost Drivers:
Equipment: Moderate to high initial investment. Entry-level printers start around $10k-$15k, with industrial models reaching $50k+.
Ink & Consumables: Costly specialty inks (both colored and white). The white ink, essential for dark garments, is a significant consumable cost and can be prone to clogging, leading to waste.
Labor & Pre-Treatment: Requires garment pre-treatment (for cottons) and post-pressing for cure, adding labor time and chemical cost. Per-unit labor is relatively constant.
Best For: Low to medium volume, high-detail, full-color designs on 100% cotton or light blends. Cost per unit is relatively stable regardless of design complexity.

2. Sublimation Printing

Principle: Heat and pressure transfer solid ink from paper to polymer-based materials (fabrics, coated substrates).
Cost Drivers:
Equipment: Low to moderate. A good heat press ($1k-$5k) and a dedicated sublimation printer (modified inkjet, $500-$3k) are the core needs.
Ink & Transfer Paper: Moderate. Bulk sublimation ink is cost-effective. The transfer paper is a key consumable cost—its quality directly impacts yield and defect rates, making a reliable roll-to-roll supplier critical for volume.
Labor & Substrate: Efficient for batch production. Labor cost per unit drops significantly with multiple transfers per press. The major cost factor becomes the substrate itself (polyester garment, coated blank), which is often more expensive than plain cotton.
Best For: Medium to high volume of all-over prints, hard goods, and polyester apparel. Excellent economies of scale. Lowest per-unit cost for full-color designs within its material limitations.

3. Screen Printing

Principle: Ink is pushed through a mesh screen onto the garment, one color at a time.
Cost Drivers:
Equipment & Setup: High upfront cost for automatic presses ($20k+). The biggest cost is setup (screen making), which is time-consuming and incurs fixed costs per design/color.
Ink & Labor: Plastisol ink is inexpensive. However, labor cost is high per color due to setup, cleaning, and manual steps. Excellent ink coverage and opacity.
Economies of Scale: The ultimate volume play. The high setup cost is amortized over the run, making the per-unit cost extremely low for large orders (100+ pieces). Prohibitively expensive for very small batches.
Best For: High-volume orders with limited colors (spot designs), or simple designs on dark garments. Cost per unit plummets as quantity increases.

4. Heat Transfer Vinyl (HTV) / Cut Vinyl

Principle: A cutting plotter shapes colored vinyl sheets, which are then weeded and heat-pressed onto the garment.
Cost Drivers:
Equipment: Low. A cutter ($300-$2k) and a heat press.
Material & Labor: Vinyl material cost is moderate to high, especially for specialty finishes (glitter, reflective). Labor cost is the dominant factor—each design requires cutting, weeding (manual removal of excess), and positioning. This makes it highly labor-intensive and not easily scalable.
Waste: Generates significant vinyl waste during cutting/weeding.
Best For: Ultra-small batches, one-offs, and lettering/numbering. Ideal for customization but economically unsustainable for medium/large runs or complex multi-color designs.

5. Direct-to-Film (DTF) Printing

Principle: A hybrid method. Ink is printed onto a special film, adhesive powder is applied, then it's heat-pressed onto virtually any fabric.
Cost Drivers:
Equipment: Moderate. Requires a dedicated printer, powder shaker, and a heat press.
Consumables: High. Uses specific inks and the special adhesive powder is a major consumable. Film cost is also a factor.
Labor & Versatility: Less labor-intensive than HTV. Its key value is substrate versatility (works on cotton, polyester, blends, even nylon) without pre-treatment. Per-unit cost is higher than sublimation or large-run screen printing but offers flexibility.
Best For: Medium runs on mixed materials, especially for businesses needing to print on both cotton and polyester without maintaining two separate systems (DTG & Sublimation).

Cost Comparison Summary (Generalized)

Method	Best for Volume	Upfront Cost	Per-Unit Cost Driver	Economies of Scale?	Ideal Use Case
Screen Printing	Very High	High	Setup & Labor	Excellent	Bulk orders, simple colors, corporate wear
Sublimation	Medium-High	Low-Moderate	Substrate & Paper	Very Good	Sportswear, all-over-print, hard goods
DTG	Low-Medium	Moderate-High	Ink & Pre-Treatment	Poor	Photographic detail on cotton, prototypes
DTF	Low-Medium	Moderate	Powder & Film	Moderate	Mixed fabric types, no pre-treatment needed
HTV	Very Low	Low	Labor & Material Waste	None	Single items, customization, names/numbers

The Bottom Line: There is no single "cheapest" method. Screen printing dominates for long runs of simple designs. Sublimation is unbeatable for polyester volume. DTG wins for cotton complexity in low quantities. The trend is towards hybrid shops utilizing DTF or combining DTG/Sublimation to maximize flexibility.

The smartest investment is understanding your target market's order profile and choosing the technology that aligns your cost structure with their demand.

Which cost factors surprise you the most in your operation? Are you considering integrating a new method to improve your margins? Share your thoughts below.

#PrintingBusiness #TextilePrinting #CostAnalysis #DTG #Sublimation #ScreenPrinting #HTV #DTF #Manufacturing #ApparelProduction #LeanManufacturing

Shelf with fabric samples and color swatches next to fashion design sketches.

Ferrill

Evelyn

Suzy

Ray